Key Points
The “hardware-software” analogy helps understand the body (hardware) and parts/self (software) in IFS.
The Self, as pure energy, is distinct from the embodied Self, which is impacted by neurodiversity.
Neurodiversity doesn’t equate to less access to self; societal barriers create limitations.
Summary
Defining Neurodiversity and Neurodivergence
The podcast begins by defining key terms: neurodivergence as functioning outside the neurotypical norm (a culturally-situated concept), and neurodiversity as the inherent variation in human brains. Left-handedness is used as an illustrative example, highlighting how societal norms have historically pathologized this difference, differing across cultures and time periods. The speakers also emphasize that the ‘neurotypical’ is not a singular entity but a dominant social construct.
Neurodiversity and IFS
The discussion transitions to integrating these concepts within the IFS framework. The speakers introduce the “hardware-software” analogy, comparing the body and its neurology (hardware) to the internal system of parts (software). This analogy helps understand how neurodiversity influences the system’s experience and functioning. A key point raised is that the Self, viewed as pure energy, exists independently of the body, although its expression is always embodied. Therefore, while the embodied Self is affected by neurodiversity, the pure Self-energy might not inherently neurodivergent or neurotypical.
The Self: Neurodivergent or Neurodiverse?
A central question is posed: is the Self neurodivergent? The speakers discuss differing perspectives. They then offer a nuanced perspective, suggesting the Self is neither inherently neurodivergent nor neurotypical. Instead, the Self’s expression is shaped by the body, influenced by neurology, neurodiversity, culture, etc. The Self-energy interacts with the body’s hardware, resulting in an embodied experience affected by neurodiversity.
Advocacy and Implications for IFS Therapy
The speakers emphasise the importance of advocacy for neurodivergent individuals, countering the tendency to pathologise neurodivergence. They highlight that neurodiversity is not inherently a problem to be solved; rather, societal barriers and expectations create challenges. The discussion concludes by focusing on the importance of curiosity and neutrality when exploring neurodiversity within IFS therapy, emphasising self-acceptance and growth over criticism. The goal is to harness these discussions to promote self-acceptance and growth in individuals and clients.
